designArc Raidersanalysis

Designing Maps for Multiple Sizes: Lessons Arc Raiders Can Use From Top FPS Titles

aallgames

2026-01-31

11 min read

Design map families — small, medium, large — for Arc Raiders. Practical strategies from AAA shooters to scale maps across modes and player counts.

Stop juggling one-size-fits-all maps — design map families that scale

Pain point: live-service shooters like Arc Raiders need map variety that supports multiple modes and player counts without splitting the player base or creating balance nightmares. Embark Studios’ 2026 roadmap teased "multiple maps across a spectrum of size," which is the right direction — but the real win is a deliberate map family strategy that makes small, medium, and large variants feel coherent, fair, and fun.

This article gives practical, modern guidance — backed by examples from AAA FPS titles and 2026 development trends — for building map families: how to create small, medium, and large siblings that share identity, reuse assets, and play clean across modes and player counts. Expect actionable checklists, telemetry-driven tuning tips, and conversion patterns Embark can use to evolve Arc Raiders’ five existing locales into a robust map suite.

Core concept: What a map family is and why it matters in 2026

A map family is a set of levels that share layout language, visual identity, and rules but are scaled and tuned for different player counts and modes. Think of a main hub (the medium map) and two siblings — a condensed arena for tight 6v6 or smaller skirmishes, and a sprawling battleground for larger squads or objective-driven modes.

Why this matters now (2026):

Live-service expectations: players want fresh maps and variants each season without fragmenting matchmaking.
Cloud-hosted scaling: improved server tech lets designers push bigger maps, but balance and flow still require careful tuning.
AI-assisted tooling: procedural placement and telemetry analytics let teams quickly generate and iterate map variants.
Player behavior data: modern telemetry enables rapid measurement of choke points, engagement times, and imbalance — turning map families into an empirically-driven design loop.

Three canonical sizes and their roles

Small (compact arenas)

Purpose: high-intensity skirmishes, short round lengths, lower player counts (2–8 per side). Use cases: practice, ranked play, special modes, 1v1/2v2, and fast casual playlists.

Design goals: short rotation time-to-contact (8–18s), multiple sightline breakups, simple objective placement.
Examples: Call of Duty’s "Gunfight" maps, Valorant’s tight Spike sites when rotated for 3v3, Halo’s arena maps.

Medium (core competitive maps)

Purpose: the primary matchmaking experience. Balanced for typical player counts (6–10v6–10) and core modes. This is the identity map players learn and return to.

Design goals: clear lanes, predictable rotations, multiple viable routes, verticality that rewards skill rather than camping.
Examples: Counter-Strike-style bomb sites, Overwatch payload/control points, Arc Raiders’ existing medium-sized locales like Blue Gate and Buried City.

Large (open, objective-driven arenas)

Purpose: vehicle-friendly or squad-scale modes, extended objectives, emergent play, and exploration. Best for 24+ players or multi-squad AI co-op in live-service games.

Design goals: meaningful mid-field control points, funneling without chokepoint collapse, long sightlines balanced by cover and movement options.
Examples: Battlefield Conquest maps, Apex Legends’ drops with regional hotspots, Halo Big Team Battle maps.

How top shooters create map families — patterns you can reuse

1) Asset-driven modularity: reuse without repeating

AAA teams build a library of modular pieces — market stalls, staircases, elevator shafts, destructible crates — that can be recombined to create siblings with a shared aesthetic but different flows. This reduces content cost and gives players a sense of familiarity.

Actionable: Start a "family kit" for each Arc Raiders locale: core modules (central plaza, two flanking alleys, rooftop routes), cover patterns, and lighting presets. Recompose modules to scale a map up or down while keeping sightline language consistent.

2) Hub-and-spoke scaling

Design the medium map as a hub with spokes leading to distinct combat theaters. Small variants compress spokes into one or two theaters; large variants extend spokes into new objectives and intermediate control nodes.

Example: make Stella Montis the hub. The small variant keeps the lobby and an adjacent corridor theatre for fast skirmishes. The large variant unlocks gardens, service tunnels, and a rooftop node to create longer rotations and multi-layered choke control.

Use diagram-driven flows and onboarding principles from modern tooling to codify the hub and spoke relationships for designers and level builders — see approaches that mirror developer onboarding diagrams for clarity.

3) Gating and gating toggles

A quick way to create small/medium/large versions from one build is runtime gating — spawn blockers, deployable doors, or temporary walls. Call of Duty and Valorant have used dynamic barriers or mode-specific geometry to shrink playable areas without building from scratch.

Actionable: Implement "map gates" that change between playlists: closed alleys and temporary cover for small maps; open alleys and additional spawn rings for large modes. Keep gating logic visible to players (signage, lighting cues) to avoid confusion.

4) Objective-driven transformations

Change the objective template to alter map tempo. Transform a control point map into a bomb/plant arena by moving objectives to tighter clusters and reducing peripheral spawn options. This is how Overwatch and Rainbow Six Siege recontextualize rooms to create different experiences on similar geometry.

5) Sightline grammar and verticality parity

Keep a consistent sightline grammar across map sizes: where long sightlines exist in a large map, break them in the small variant with cover, destructible objects, or elevation changes. Preserve opportunities for vertical play but scale the risk/reward so that low-skill camping is less effective on smaller maps.

Balancing player counts: practical rules of thumb

When scaling maps by player count, use these tuning anchors:

Engagement time — Aim for first-contact in 8–20 seconds for small maps, 20–40 seconds for medium, 40+ for large.
Combat density — Desired simultaneous engagements per minute: small 4–8, medium 8–14, large 14+ (use telemetry to refine).
Spawn distance — Avoid spawn kills: minimum safe distance should scale with player movement speed and ability kit range.
Objective spacing — Place objectives so that rotation time sits between one and three minutes in medium maps; reduce to 30–90s in small maps for faster rounds.

Mode-specific tuning: how to alter the same map for different objectives

Control/King of the Hill

Design a ring of approaches with predictable flanking routes. For smaller variants, reduce flanking depth and add interior cover. For large variants, create layered capture zones where teams can trade altitude for cover.

Attack/Defend (Bomb/Plant)

Emphasize asymmetry but keep multiple valid attack routes. In small maps, keep only two meaningful approaches to sharpen tactical depth. In larger maps, provide a mix of long-range and close-quarters lanes with intermediate control points/screens.

Objective Rush / Extraction

Create funnels that force decision points (expose a squad moving through a plaza vs. a risky rooftop path). For large maps, add mobile objectives or multi-stage timers to maintain pacing.

Telemetry-first iteration: measuring what matters

Modern map design is data-driven. Use these key metrics to iterate:

First-contact time — validates engagement pacing.
Heatmaps — show popular routes and dead zones.
Spawn-kill rate — target under 5–7% for healthy flow.
Objective contest time — how long capture points change hands.
Kill spread — low spread indicates balanced opportunities; high spread may signal dominant sightlines or camping spots.

2026 tooling update: AI-driven analytics can now surface these metrics automatically and suggest candidate geometry tweaks (move a crate, add cover, shift a spawn). Use these as designer prompts, not autopilot fixes.

Case studies: real lessons from AAA shooters

Call of Duty — small-variant emphasis

Call of Duty often ships tightly-designed small maps for specific modes (3v3, Gunfight). The lesson: if you want high-skill, quick games, design with intentional choke manipulation and predictable sightlines. But COD also shows the risk of over-optimizing small maps for specific meta weapons — keep diversity by providing multiple engagement ranges.

Counter-Strike 2 — sightline polish and spacing

CS2’s rework of classic maps highlights the power of micro-spacing and careful cover placement. Every crate and ledge communicates purpose. For map families, adopt this micro-design discipline: scale cover placement logically so a box that offers half-cover in the medium map becomes a full barrier in the small variant.

Apex Legends / Battlefield — large map flow and hotspots

Apex balances large drop maps with regional hotspots that attract fights. Battlefield’s Conquest spaces allow long-range control but fail when objective spread creates unfun dead time. The takeaway: large maps need clearly-signposted mid-fields and optional fast-travel/vehicle routes to prevent stagnation.

Overwatch 2 — objective diversity and mode-specific shifts

Overwatch 2 reshapes maps for different modes (push vs control) and sometimes toggles geometry. Its lesson: mode-specific rules can reinvent a map without changing the art — but you must communicate rule changes clearly to players with UI and level cues.

Practical checklist for building Arc Raiders map families

Define the medium map first. This is the canonical layout and the identity anchor for the family.
Build a module kit. Create reusable geometry, props, and lighting presets per locale.
Create small and large blueprints. Use hub-and-spoke and gating to scale while preserving sightline grammar.
Introduce mode toggles. Gates, objectives, and spawn rings switch per playlist to keep one visual map usable for many modes.
Instrument aggressively. Collect first-contact time, heatmaps, spawn-kill, and objective contest metrics from day one.
Iterate with rapid A/B testing. Run rotated playlists with minor geometry changes and compare metrics over 48–72 hour windows.
Leverage player feedback. Social channels, in-game reporting, and curated playtests catch feel-based problems analytics miss.

Advanced strategies: emerging 2026 techniques

AI-assisted polishing

2026 tools can propose micro-adjustments to cover placement and spawn rings based on player heatmap anomalies. Use these suggestions to speed iteration but validate with playtests. For tooling and governance concerns, make sure tooling integrates with existing data stores and product playbooks used by ops and analytics teams (consolidation playbooks).

Dynamic seasonal variants

Instead of siloed seasonal maps, roll seasonal modifiers into map families: winter gates that close certain paths, daytime/nighttime that alters sightlines, or event-specific props that open new routes. This extends longevity without doubling content cost — and you can monetize or A/B seasonal changes similarly to micro-drops used across live services.

Cross-mode meta balancing

Track weapon/ability performance per map size. Some kits excel at long sightlines, others in tight rooms. If a kit dominates a small variant, consider map-level counters (extra cover, visibility changes) instead of nerfs.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

Fragmented matchmaking: Avoid creating too many unique playlists that split players. Use map families to keep one medium playlist healthy and rotate small/large modes as secondary queues.
Visual confusion: Players should immediately recognize playable bounds and mode toggles; use distinct lighting, signage, and audio cues when geometry changes.
Over-reliance on gating: Gating speeds production but can feel artificial. Blend gating with environmental storytelling — collapsed walls, sealed doors, or mission timers explain why areas are off-limits.
Ignoring telemetry: Opinions matter, but you must quantify balance issues. Use metrics to prioritize changes that impact the most players. Store and index telemetry and design artifacts with privacy-first tagging and collaborative workflows like the edge tagging playbook.

Final takeaways — a playbook for Embark and Arc Raiders

Arc Raiders’ 2026 plan to add maps across size is the right move. To make it meaningful, Embark should:

Adopt map families rooted in a medium canonical layout.
Invest in modular kits and gating systems to produce small and large siblings efficiently.
Instrument each variant with telemetry and run rapid A/B tuning cycles.
Use seasonal modifiers and AI-assisted tooling to keep variants fresh without doubling content costs.

"There are going to be multiple maps coming this year across a spectrum of size... some smaller than any currently in the game, while others may be even grander than what we've got now." — Virgil Watkins, Embark design lead (GamesRadar, 2026)

That tease matters only if the new maps come as a coherent, scalable family that fits Arc Raiders’ modes and player counts. Follow the practices above and Embark can expand their five beloved locales into a versatile suite that supports tournaments, casual playlists, and seasonal events — all without fragmenting the community or losing the feel players love.

Actionable next steps for designers

Create a "medium first" design doc for one Arc Raiders locale this week — map identity, hub-and-spoke nodes, and a module list.
Ship a gated small variant in the next patch and measure first-contact and spawn-kill rates for 2 weeks.
Run a playtest with AI-suggested micro-adjustments and compare pre/post telemetry to validate the approach.

Designing map families is both art and engineering. With modular thinking, telemetry discipline, and mode-aware tuning, Arc Raiders — and any modern shooter — can build level variety that keeps players engaged across seasons, modes, and skill tiers.

Join the conversation

If you design maps or run playtests for Arc Raiders or other shooters, we want to hear what worked and what broke. Share your telemetry highlights, favorite modular assets, or funny map exploits — and subscribe for ongoing breakdowns of seasonal map updates and AAA design lessons.

allgames

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.